Graphic Organizer: Gerrymandering, Representation, and Consent of the Governed
Questions to help students see the representative government questions in Baker v. Carr (1962) and Shaw v. Reno (1993).
Graphic Organizer: Gerrymandering, Representation, and Consent of the Governed
Directions: Fill in the tables below about the two Supreme Court cases then answer the follow-up question.
Baker v. Carr (1962) | 
|
| Summary of case | |
| Court decision | |
| Main ideas from majority opinion | |
| Main ideas from dissenting opinion | |
| Case connections to representation and consent of the governed
 
  | 
|
| Do you agree with the Court’s decision in this case? Why or why not?
 
  | 
|
| What questions do you still have about this case? | |
Shaw v. Reno (1993) | 
|
| Summary of case | |
| Court decision | |
| Main ideas from majority opinion | |
| Main ideas from dissenting opinion | |
| Case connections to representation and consent of the governed
 
  | 
|
| Do you agree with the Court’s decision in this case? Why or why not?
 
  | 
|
| What questions do you still have about this case? | |
Assess and Reflect:
- Based on the sources you read, what is the relationship between gerrymandering, the concept of representation, and the principle of consent of the governed?
 
