Lesson
Grover Cleveland and the Texas Seed Bill Veto
Guiding question
Why would the President adhere to the Constitution during a crisis?

Cleveland understood his constitutional legislative responsibility as preventing harmful bills from becoming law, rather than promoting what he saw as beneficial ones. Using the veto, Cleveland stopped the federal government from taking on what he saw as a “paternal” role toward citizens, whether that role came in the form of excessive or fraudulent pension payouts, or in proposed relief for drought-stricken farmers in Texas. These principled stances brought him many enemies, but he did not waver from his commitment to exercising only the powers warranted by the Constitution. One American author said that Cleveland’s “patriotic virtues have won for [him] the homage of half a nation and the enmity of the other half. This places [his] character upon a summit as high as Washington’s.”
Founding Principles
Individual Responsibility, Checks and Balances, Separation of Powers
Virtues
Objectives:
Students will:
- Understand Grover Cleveland’s philosophy of limited government.
- Analyze Cleveland’s actions as President in light of the Constitution.
- Evaluate the prudence of Cleveland’s veto of the Texas Seed Bill.
- Assess whether Cleveland deserved the “homage” or the “enmity” of the nation.
Materials
- Handout A: Grover Cleveland and the Texas Seed Bill Veto
- Handout B: Cleveland’s Veto Message
- Handout C: Document Guide
Lesson Components
Lesson plan
50 minClick a phase to open it
More Information
To create a context for this lesson, have students complete Constitutional Connection: The President and Federal Power.



